+
All "Authors TBC" placeholder references have been replaced with fully cited entries, restoring evidentiary credibility.
+
A complete coding scheme table now appears in the appendix, mapping extracted factors → open codes → themes → key sources.
+
A formal Section 6 Conclusion has been added, providing a clear closing synthesis.
+
The PRISMA-ScR flow diagram makes the screening process replicable and visible.
+
The research question and conclusion language have been broadened toward "technical professional," nudging the framing beyond developers.
+
Some inline citations (e.g., [E20], [E10], [T24]) now anchor specific claims to specific sources.
−
The framework is still built around UAV/urban drone development; the title, the examples in Sections 3.1–3.6, and the use case are domain-specific, so the Type 3 generality requirement is still not satisfied.
−
A new numerical inconsistency has been introduced: 42 sources are claimed in the method and conclusion, while the parenthetical breakdown and PRISMA diagram both show 53.
−
No diagram or summary table visualizes the six-theme framework itself, so relationships between layers remain invisible at a glance.
−
Section 3.6 still overlaps substantially with Section 5 (Gaps), creating redundancy and weakening the framework's conceptual unity.
−
Many subsections still rely on "Sources: …" blocks at the end rather than inline citation per claim, so the link between specific assertions and specific evidence is often unclear.
−
The stakeholder perspective remains narrowly tied to the developer; broader technical professionals are invoked rhetorically but not analyzed.